THIS WEEK'S DEEP DIVE
Most founders think they're competing against other companies.
They're usually not.
They spend months studying competitors:
Features
Pricing
Positioning
Fundraising announcements
It feels like strategy.
Often, it's distraction.
Because the biggest obstacle standing between your product and growth is rarely another startup.
It's the behavior your user already has.
And behavior is much harder to beat than competition.
THE WRONG BATTLE
When a startup struggles to acquire users, the default reaction is predictable.
"We need more features."
"We need better pricing."
"We need to differentiate."
Sometimes those things matter.
But many products fail despite being objectively better.
History is full of products with superior technology that never achieved meaningful adoption.
Why?
Because people don't wake up looking for better products.
They wake up with existing habits.
And habits have an unfair advantage.
They're familiar.
They're trusted.
They're effortless.
The user already knows how they work.
Your product doesn't just need to be better.
It needs to be better enough to justify changing behavior.
That's a much higher bar.
Every habit comes bundled with three advantages.
1. Predictability
Users know exactly what happens next.
There's no uncertainty.
No learning curve.
No surprises.
Humans naturally prefer predictability over optimization.
That's why people keep using imperfect systems long after better alternatives exist.
2. Low Cognitive Load
Habits don't require decisions.
The brain loves this.
Every repeated behavior becomes cheaper over time.
Opening Google.
Checking WhatsApp.
Watching Netflix.
Using Excel.
These actions happen almost automatically.
Your product isn't competing with a company.
It's competing with automation inside the user's brain.
3. Trust
The existing solution may be flawed.
But it feels safe.
Users understand its limitations.
They've built workflows around it.
They've learned how to navigate its problems.
A new product isn't fighting dissatisfaction.
It's fighting comfort.
And comfort is one of the strongest forces in business.
CASE STUDY #1: NETFLIX
Most people think Netflix competed with cable television.
That's only partially true.
Cable wasn't just a service.
It was a habit.
People came home from work.
Turned on the television.
Scrolled through channels.
Watched whatever was available.
The routine was deeply embedded in everyday life.
Netflix's breakthrough wasn't streaming technology.
The breakthrough was making entertainment consumption feel easier than channel surfing.
They reduced friction between desire and action.
Want to watch something?
Click.
That's it.
The lesson wasn't technological.
It was behavioral.
Netflix didn't replace a product.
It replaced a ritual.
CASE STUDY #2: NOTION
Many people assume Notion won because it built a better note-taking app.
But the real competitor wasn't Evernote.
Or Google Docs.
Or Trello.
The real competitor was fragmented work.
The habit looked something like this:
Notes in one app
Tasks in another
Documents somewhere else
Knowledge scattered across tabs
People accepted the chaos because it was familiar.
Notion's insight wasn't product-related.
It was psychological.
They convinced users that scattered thinking was a problem worth solving.
Only then did the product become valuable.
The lesson:
Before changing behavior, you often need to change perception.
CASE STUDY #3: CHATGPT
For over two decades, humans developed a reflex.
When they had a question, they opened Google.
Not because Google was perfect.
Because the behavior was automatic.
Search became infrastructure.
Then ChatGPT arrived.
Most people viewed it as a search competitor.
That misses the bigger picture.
The real competition was the reflex itself.
The instinct.
The muscle memory.
The default behavior.
The reason ChatGPT grew so quickly wasn't simply because it answered questions differently.
It created moments where users realized:
"Why am I searching through ten links when I can just ask?"
Once that realization occurred, behavior began shifting.
And when behavior shifts, markets shift.
THE BIGGER INSIGHT
Founders often believe they're in a technology race.
Most are actually in a behavior-change business.
Technology creates possibilities.
Behavior determines adoption.
That's why history is filled with examples of technically superior products losing to inferior ones.
The winner wasn't always the better technology.
The winner was the product that fit more naturally into human behavior.
Or successfully changed that behavior.
Understanding this changes how you think about growth.
The question stops being:
"How do we beat competitors?"
And becomes:
"What would have to be true for someone to permanently change how they do this?"
That's a far more useful question.
A MENTAL MODEL
Think of habits as distribution channels.
Every morning, millions of people open the same apps.
Use the same tools.
Follow the same workflows.
Not because they consciously choose them every day.
Because those behaviors already occupy space in their minds.
That's distribution.
And distribution built through habit is often stronger than distribution built through marketing.
Founders spend enormous energy acquiring users.
Very few spend enough energy understanding the behaviors they must replace.
Yet that is often where growth is won or lost.
THE HABIT REPLACEMENT MAP
Before building another feature, answer these four questions.
1. What is the user doing today?
Not your competitor.
The actual behavior.
The workflow.
The workaround.
The habit.
2. Why does that behavior feel good enough?
Look for:
Familiarity
Speed
Trust
Convenience
These are usually stronger than feature advantages.
3. What is the switching cost?
Consider:
Learning effort
Team adoption
Data migration
Risk perception
Most switching costs are psychological before they're technical.
4. What event breaks the old habit?
There's usually a trigger.
A moment of frustration.
A failed workflow.
A recommendation from someone trusted.
A changing market.
Find that moment.
Build toward it.
AKTBOOK REFLECTION
One of the biggest mistakes founders make is assuming adoption is rational.
It's not.
People rarely choose products because they're objectively better.
They choose products that fit naturally into their lives.
Or products that make changing behavior feel effortless.
That's why building is only half the challenge.
The other half is understanding people.
And the founders who understand behavior usually beat founders who only understand technology.
CLOSING THOUGHT
A better product that ignores user habits is like a faster road that starts from the wrong city.
The destination may be incredible.
But if it doesn't connect to where people already are, nobody will take it.
The next time you're worried about competitors, ask yourself:
What habit are we really competing against?
The answer might reveal more about your growth problem than any competitor analysis ever will.
—
Abhishek Sharma
Founder, AktBook
Documenting Startups, AI & Product Thinking.